On August 31, reserve cotton sales again closed with a 100% transaction rate, with an average price of 17,569 yuan/ton, down 19 yuan from the previous day. On the surface, this is just routine data, but a breakdown of the divergent performance between Xinjiang cotton and imported cotton reveals that textile mills' restocking logic is undergoing a substantive shift.
Signals Behind the Transaction Data
All 8,001.663 tons offered were transacted, marking the 31st consecutive trading day with a 100% transaction rate since the current sales round began on July 20. Cumulative volume has exceeded 248,700 tons, meaning that at this traditional seasonal transition point, mills have voted with real money on their expectations for future raw material supply.
Notably, the variety divergence: Xinjiang cotton averaged 17,653 yuan/ton, up 128 yuan from the previous day, with a 3128-equivalent price of 18,316 yuan and an average premium of 1,088 yuan; imported cotton averaged 17,556 yuan, down 51 yuan, with a 3128-equivalent of 18,199 yuan and a premium of 971 yuan. The price gap between Xinjiang and imported cotton widened from about 50 yuan to 97 yuan, indicating that mills are willing to pay a higher premium for domestic cotton.
This divergence is not accidental. The 3128-equivalent for imported cotton fell 200 yuan day-on-day, while Xinjiang cotton rose 264 yuan. The opposite trends reflect that, amid global supply chain disruptions, mills value the stability of domestic supply more. Premiums hovering near 1,000 yuan also suggest that competition for high-quality cotton remains intense.
Transmission Logic Across the Industrial Chain
A full subscription rate for reserve cotton has a multi-directional impact on the cotton spinning chain. For upstream ginners, the reserve sales price serves as a market anchor, with the 17,569 yuan average providing a reference range for new crop seed cotton purchase prices, curbing blind bidding.
For midstream textile mills, a 100% transaction rate means that at any price, there are always buyers. Behind this is the expectation of order recovery—if end demand were weak, mills would not restock so aggressively. But the divergence in premiums also signals that supply-demand balances differ by variety: Xinjiang cotton faces tight supply due to transport cycles and quota limits, while imported cotton is more volatile due to exchange rates and shipping schedules.
For downstream garment exporters, the reserve price directly affects cotton yarn costs. Currently, Xinjiang cotton's 3128-equivalent is about 117 yuan higher than imported cotton. If this gap persists, mills using imported cotton will gain a cost advantage, potentially shifting some orders' raw material sourcing. Meanwhile, cumulative sales of 248,700 tons represent about 4% of annual cotton output. Continued reserve releases ease commercial inventory pressure but also imply limited additional supply later.
