The reserve cotton auction on September 24 cleared all 8,005.611 tonnes on offer, posting a 100% clearance rate at an average price of 16,662.82 yuan per tonne, or 17,448.82 yuan per tonne on a 3128B-adjusted basis. The day-on-day gain was just 13.85 yuan per tonne. Against a backdrop of sluggish downstream textile demand, this near-perfect sell-through is striking: yarn margins have not improved in tandem, yet competition for discounted raw material remains intense. The market appears to be front-loading restocking before orders actually recover.
Event Background
Since the current round began, cumulative offerings have reached 401,691.7451 tonnes, with 398,584.7791 tonnes sold, a cumulative clearance rate of 99.23%. The cumulative average price stands at 17,186 yuan per tonne, or 17,845.04 yuan per tonne on a 3128B-adjusted basis. The highest transaction price was 19,370 yuan per tonne, the lowest 16,010 yuan per tonne, with an average premium of 1,147.35 yuan per tonne. Virtually every tonne offered has found a buyer—a no-unsold-lot situation rarely seen in recent reserve sales.
Breaking down by origin, imported cotton has averaged 17,231.17 yuan per tonne, or 17,896.80 yuan per tonne on a 3128B-adjusted basis, with an average premium of 1,147.80 yuan per tonne. Xinjiang cotton has averaged 16,997.17 yuan per tonne, or 17,628.62 yuan per tonne adjusted, with an average premium of 1,145.45 yuan per tonne. The spread between imported and Xinjiang cotton on an adjusted basis is about 268 yuan per tonne—narrow enough to suggest buyers are chasing value rather than a particular origin.
Industry Impact
Why does the clearance rate stay near 100%? The core reason is that the reserve floor price still offers a safety margin against spot market levels. For spinners, securing spinnable cotton at around 16,600 yuan per tonne leaves a thin but positive margin on standard yarn counts. This means reserve cotton is acting as a cost anchor, limiting further downside in spot prices and giving mills a clearer floor when quoting yarn.
Yet a high clearance rate does not equal strong end demand. Current restocking is price-driven, not order-driven. If the pace of reserve releases slows or floor prices rise, bidding enthusiasm could cool quickly. For ginners and traders, sustained full clearance diverts some spot purchasing demand, potentially delaying sales pressure during the new crop season and stretching the price negotiation window.
For downstream fabric and garment exporters, moderate raw material price gains are a double-edged sword. On one hand, slightly higher yarn costs squeeze already thin processing margins. On the other, price stabilization helps keep export quotes steady and reduces contract default risks caused by volatile cotton prices. China Customs data show textile and apparel export growth remains low, with no clear sign of a strong demand recovery. The sustainability of this restocking round therefore deserves scrutiny.
