Bangladesh is entering new loan negotiations with the International Monetary Fund (IMF), aiming to replace its existing $5.5 billion bailout program. This development sends ripples through the textile industry: as the world's second-largest garment exporter, Bangladesh’s apparel sector consumes approximately 15% of China’s total fabric exports. If the loan conditions require accelerated exchange rate marketization, the pressure on the Bangladeshi taka to depreciate will directly impact pricing and settlement mechanisms in Sino-Bangladesh fabric trade.
Background
The IMF has agreed to Bangladesh's request and will dispatch a staff mission to Dhaka to discuss a new loan program. The existing $5.5 billion bailout, approved in early 2023, was designed to shore up the country's foreign exchange reserves. However, reserves have fallen again to around $19 billion in the first two months of this year, covering only three and a half months of imports. Core issues in the new negotiations include fiscal deficit control, exchange rate flexibility reforms, and import tariff adjustments.
For Chinese textile suppliers, Bangladesh’s reserve fragility is not new. In 2023, the dollar shortage extended Letter of Credit (L/C) opening cycles to 45-60 days, forcing some to accept T/T payments. If the new loan imposes stricter liberalization terms, the taka could depreciate another 8%-12% against the dollar this year, further squeezing the profit margins of Bangladeshi factories.
Industry Impact
Bangladesh’s garment exports account for about 85% of its total exports, and roughly 60% of its fabric is imported from China. Currency depreciation has a dual impact on the supply chain: in the short term, it boosts the price competitiveness of Bangladeshi apparel, but in the long term, it raises the cost of imported raw materials. Chinese Customs data shows that the average export price of polyester filament and cotton woven fabric to Bangladesh rose by 3.2% year-on-year in 2023, while the taka depreciated by about 12% against the dollar, meaning actual procurement costs for Bangladeshi factories increased by over 15%.
A deeper concern is tariff policy. The IMF typically requires borrowing countries to cut subsidies and broaden the tax base; Bangladesh may be forced to raise import tariffs or reduce tariff exemption categories. Currently, Chinese fabric enters Bangladesh duty-free under the Asia-Pacific Trade Agreement, but if Bangladesh adjusts rates to boost revenue, the cost advantage for Chinese suppliers will weaken. Internal documents from the Dhaka Chamber of Commerce indicate that the country's textile association has proposed a 5%-10% regulatory tariff on certain synthetic fabrics.
For buyers, risks are already materializing. Recently, Bangladeshi banks have raised L/C margin requirements from 20% to 30%-40%, and some small- and medium-sized garment factories are even required to make 100% advance payments. This has stretched the accounts receivable turnover for Chinese fabric companies from 45 days to over 70 days. If exchange rate volatility intensifies after the new loan is finalized, the hedging cost for forward settlements could add an extra 2-3 percentage points.
