In early July 2026, the domestic polyester DTY market sent a telling price signal. Rongsheng Petrochemical quoted 9,150 yuan/ton for 150D/48F semi-dull low-elastic variety, while Zhejiang Juxing Chemical Fiber quoted 9,000 yuan/ton—a 150 yuan gap between two companies in the same province.

The Logic Behind Quotation Divergence

Price divergence for identical specifications in the same region is uncommon in industry data. Rongsheng, as a PTA-polyester integrated giant, tends to anchor its quotes to upstream cost support, with 9,150 yuan/ton reflecting a willingness to maintain margins. Zhejiang Juxing, a mid-sized chemical fiber producer, more directly mirrors the actual purchasing power of downstream weaving mills.

This spread means that buyers face not a unified market price but a fracturing quotation system. Making decisions based on a single quote risks overpaying or missing a lower entry point.

The 9,000 Yuan Threshold Battle

9,000 yuan/ton is both a psychological and technical level in industry history. On the cost side, PTA and MEG prices have recently oscillated narrowly, squeezing polyester DTY cash margins close to breakeven. A decisive break below 9,000 yuan would severely pressure the cash flow of small and medium enterprises.

On the demand side, the comprehensive loom operating rate in Jiangsu and Zhejiang hovered around 70% in Q2 2026, lower than the same period last year. End-use apparel brands place mainly short-run, urgent orders, lacking sustained large-scale commitments. Consequently, weaving mills prefer just-in-time procurement over building inventory.

Transmission Effects in Regional Industrial Clusters

Zhejiang Province, as a major polyester filament production base, often sets the tone for price movements across the country. The Rongsheng-Juxing divergence essentially reflects differing outlooks between large integrated players and smaller specialized mills.

Large enterprises can buffer inventory pressure with their full-chain capabilities from PTA to weaving. Smaller chemical fiber producers must respond more quickly to market signals. Juxing's 9,000 yuan quote is a goodwill gesture toward weavers. If this divergence persists, it may trigger a latent industry shakeout.

Implications for Downstream Sourcing Strategy

In the current environment, polyester DTY prices are neither in a clear uptrend nor downtrend but oscillating in a range-bound pattern—capped by weak demand and floored by raw material costs and industry discipline.

For weaving mills, the 9,000 yuan level may offer a phased restocking window, but betting on a price rally for large-scale hoarding is unwise. For chemical fiber plants, pricing strategies need flexibility—balancing long-term contract prices with spot market elasticity to clear inventory.

For Buyers - Monitor quotes from multiple suppliers like Rongsheng and Juxing; avoid relying on a single source - Adopt phased, batch purchasing within the 9,000-9,150 yuan range rather than one large order - Negotiate short-term price protection agreements with suppliers to hedge raw material volatility

For Exporters - Use 9,000 yuan as a base reference for overseas inquiries, reserving a 5% price negotiation buffer - Monitor RMB exchange rate fluctuations to prevent FX erosion of FOB margins - Leverage the low DTY price period to sign long-term framework agreements with overseas brands, locking in order volumes

资料来源:中国纺织报查看原始资料
⚙
Manage your textile business with Jenny ERP
Sample · Order · Customer · Inventory · Production tracking — built for fabric mills and trading companies.
Try Free