Drought has become the biggest wildcard for the 2026 U.S. cotton crop. According to the latest USDA agricultural drought monitor data as of July 7, 55% of U.S. cotton-producing areas are experiencing drought—a staggering 52-percentage-point increase from the 3% recorded a year earlier. Although the figure edged down 1 percentage point from the prior week, the severity remains at historical highs for this time of year, posing a tangible threat to cotton during its critical growth phase.

Regional Drought Distribution and Growth Window

The drought is both widespread and intense. USDA state-level data shows that the hardest-hit areas include western Texas, Oklahoma, and southern Kansas, with some zones reaching D2 (severe) or even D3 (extreme) drought levels. The current period coincides with the squaring-to-boll-setting stage, when water demand peaks. Prolonged heat and low rainfall can directly cause boll shedding, reduce yields, and even force abandonment of dryland fields.

Notably, last year at this time only 3% of the cotton belt was in drought, with good soil moisture supporting a bumper 2025 crop. The current 55% drought coverage means more than half of the region is under water stress, approaching levels seen during the historic 2011 drought, when abandonment rates exceeded 35%.

How Production Shortfall Expectations Feed Into Prices

The production-loss narrative has already shown up in futures markets. The Zhengzhou Cotton Exchange's main 2609 contract closed at 15,930 yuan/ton on July 9, a notable rebound from earlier lows. ICE cotton futures also strengthened, with the front-month contract reclaiming the 72 cents/lb level. The market is pricing in a key variable: U.S. cotton output for the 2026/27 season could fall 10%-15% year-on-year.

From a supply-demand balance perspective, a decline in U.S. production would tighten the global stocks-to-use ratio, which is currently relatively comfortable. China, the world's largest cotton consumer, relies heavily on imports. A smaller U.S. crop would directly raise imported cotton costs, which in turn would push up prices for yarn, grey fabric, and even finished garments. For textile mills, this means raw material costs are likely to move higher.

Implications for Downstream Procurement and Inventory Strategy

At this stage, textile companies need to reassess their purchasing pace. The drought data has fueled bullish sentiment, but the actual extent of production losses won't be confirmed until the August USDA supply-demand report. If dry conditions persist through late July and August, the production-shortfall narrative will strengthen, increasing the probability of a linked rise in spot and futures prices.

For mills using basis pricing, the current basis is relatively low, making it a good time to lock in forward cargoes in tranches. Small and medium-sized weaving factories should consider increasing their physical inventory coverage from the usual 15-20 days to 25-30 days, to hedge against potential supply tightness and price spikes.

Alternatives and Trade Diversion Possibilities

With U.S. cotton under threat, Brazilian, Indian, and West African cotton become more competitive. Brazilian cotton output in 2026 is expected to reach a record 3.8 million tons, with improving quality. Cost-conscious mills can start building relationships with Brazilian suppliers and lock in some replacement volumes.

At the same time, trade policy between China and the U.S. must be monitored. Any adjustments to tariffs or quota arrangements could alter import flows. Foreign trade companies should include force majeure and price adjustment clauses in contracts to manage raw material volatility.

Practical Recommendations

For Procurement Teams - Closely monitor USDA weekly crop progress reports from late July through August; easing or worsening drought will directly affect price direction. - Use the current low basis to build forward hedge positions in batches, locking in procurement costs. - Increase inquiries for Brazilian and Indian cotton to diversify supply sources and reduce risk.

For Foreign Trade Enterprises - Include raw material price fluctuation clauses in export quotes to protect margins from cotton price surges. - Communicate with downstream clients in advance about delayed delivery or price renegotiation mechanisms to lower default risk. - Stay alert to Sino-U.S. trade policy and exchange rate movements, and use forward settlement tools prudently.

资料来源:中国纺织报查看原始资料
⚙
Manage your textile business with Jenny ERP
Sample · Order · Customer · Inventory · Production tracking — built for fabric mills and trading companies.
Try Free