55%—that was the proportion of U.S. cotton production areas under drought as of July 7, 2026, a staggering 52 percentage points higher than the 3% recorded a year earlier. Even with a marginal 1-percentage-point decline from the prior week, the figure is enough to keep the global cotton-textile supply chain on edge. As the world's largest cotton exporter, persistent drought in the U.S. Cotton Belt makes a production shortfall in the new season almost inevitable.

Drought Data in Full

According to the USDA's Agricultural Drought Monitor, the drought coverage rate for U.S. cotton areas stood at 55% for the week ending July 7, compared with just 3% a year ago. On a weekly basis, the drought has remained in a high-level stalemate with minimal improvement. July is the critical boll-setting period for cotton, when water demand peaks. Sustained drought directly reduces yields and shortens fiber length, thereby degrading lint quality.

It is worth noting that last year's drought coverage was only 3%, a normal low level. This year's 55% coverage is approaching the historic extreme drought of 2011, when U.S. cotton output fell about 25% below trend and international prices hit record highs. Historical patterns suggest that when drought coverage exceeds 50% for three consecutive weeks, the eventual production loss often surpasses early market estimates.

Price Transmission to Futures and Spot Markets

The drought expectation has already begun to price in. The Zhengzhou Cotton Exchange's main contract for September 2026 closed at 15,930 yuan per ton on July 9, up from recent lows. The futures market's heightened sensitivity to bullish news indicates that speculative funds are pricing in a production cut premium. However, the current price level has not fully priced in an extreme drought scenario. If dryness persists into August, the futures price could have further upside.

For the spot market, the impact will transmit in two stages:
- In the short term, ginners and traders will tighten their selling pace, waiting for higher bids; farmers' holding sentiment may intensify.
- In the medium to long term, if a production cut materializes, the supply gap after the new crop arrives will widen the basis, systematically raising spinning mills' procurement costs.

Global Supply-Demand Rebalancing Pressure

The U.S. accounts for more than 35% of global cotton trade. A production shortfall will directly reduce international available supplies. Meanwhile, other major producers such as India and Pakistan also face weather uncertainties. The global stocks-to-use ratio may shift from the current relatively loose state to a tighter one. Although China, the largest cotton consumer and importer, has been reducing its reliance on U.S. cotton, alternative supplies from Brazil and Australia cannot fully compensate for the U.S. shortfall.

For domestic textile mills, two key variables need to be assessed: first, whether the state reserve cotton release schedule will be adjusted in response to tighter international supply; second, whether downstream orders can support the pass-through of raw material cost increases. Industry feedback suggests that domestic orders are stable, but export orders, already squeezed by volatile ocean freight and exchange rates, would accelerate the shakeout of small and medium-sized enterprises if cotton prices surge significantly.

Practical Recommendations

For Procurement Managers - Build positions in tranches to lock in costs: The current main contract level of 15,930 yuan per ton is at the lower-middle range of the past three years. Consider establishing a three-month hedging position in three installments within the 15,800-16,200 range. - Monitor basis changes: If the spot basis strengthens to above +500 yuan per ton, consider using basis trading instead of fixed-price procurement to reduce premium costs. - Prepare alternative raw material plans: Increase the procurement ratio of polyester staple fiber and viscose staple fiber to keep cotton's share below 60% for risk diversification.

For Foreign Trade Companies - Include raw material price linkage mechanisms in contracts: Negotiate with overseas clients to embed cotton price index adjustment clauses in long-term agreements to avoid bearing cost increases unilaterally. - Shorten quotation validity periods: Reduce the standard 30-day quotation validity to 7-10 days to mitigate dual risks from exchange rate and raw material price fluctuations. - Monitor U.S. cotton shipment progress: Drought may degrade U.S. cotton quality. Specify quality standards and claim clauses in procurement contracts to avoid disputes upon arrival due to grade discrepancies.

资料来源:中国纺织报查看原始资料
⚙
Manage your textile business with Jenny ERP
Sample · Order · Customer · Inventory · Production tracking — built for fabric mills and trading companies.
Try Free