Data released by the National Bureau of Statistics on July 9 reveals a warning signal for the textile industry: the June PPI rose 4.1% year-on-year, but structural price divergence is far more impactful. Upstream mining prices surged 16.5%, and raw materials rose 8.6%, while downstream consumer goods prices fell 0.9%, with apparel factory prices down 1.0%. This indicates a classic 'cost push, weak demand' squeeze, pushing profit margins to historic lows.

Cost Side: Three Pillars Rising Simultaneously

Textile manufacturers face a comprehensive cost increase. On the procurement side, textile raw material prices rose 3.3% year-on-year, with a slight month-on-month increase of 0.7%, showing no relief for cotton, chemical fiber, and recycled fiber costs. More critically, chemical raw material procurement prices surged 11.5% year-on-year, directly increasing costs for polyester, nylon, auxiliaries, and functional coatings. Fuel and power procurement rose 11.8%, adding costs for weaving, dyeing, and drying processes.

This triple cost increase is not a short-term fluctuation but results from high international commodity prices, rising domestic energy demand during peak summer, and competition from computing and new energy sectors for upstream materials. For textile mills, every meter of fabric or ton of yarn now carries a higher marginal cost.

End Market: Price Transmission Blocked

In stark contrast to the upstream, downstream markets are sluggish. Apparel and home textile factory prices weakened year-on-year, and companies cannot effectively pass on costs to consumers due to ample supply and fierce competition in the end market. Brands and retailers are highly sensitive to price increases. Consequently, profit margins in chemical fiber, spinning, dyeing, and footwear sectors continue to shrink, with some small and medium enterprises nearing breakeven.

This 'upstream up, downstream down' scissors gap reflects the textile industry's weakened bargaining power in the supply chain. Upstream suppliers have pricing power due to resource scarcity and energy cost rigidity, while downstream manufacturers face a highly fragmented, competitive buyer's market with little leverage for price transmission.

Industry Response: Cost Reduction and Upgrading

In the short term, textile companies focus on cost control through optimized production scheduling, improved weaving efficiency, and energy-saving equipment, achieving unit cost reductions of 2%-5%. However, this cannot fully offset raw material and energy increases. Long-term, the industry consensus is shifting toward high-value, differentiated products to escape the low-price trap.

Specific directions include investing in green and low-carbon processes, developing functional specialty fabrics, and producing high-end specialty fibers. These products, due to their technical barriers and unique performance, can command higher pricing power in the end market and partially absorb upstream cost pressures.

Practical Recommendations

For Buyers - Monitor raw material price cycles, stock up at low points, and use futures or forward contracts to lock in costs. - Prioritize suppliers with green processes and differentiated products, as they have stronger risk resistance and delivery stability. - Establish long-term strategic partnerships with suppliers, sharing cost data and optimizing processes to reduce overall supply chain costs.

For Factories - Conduct an immediate energy audit, identify high-consumption areas, and invest in energy-efficient motors and waste heat recovery to cut per-unit energy costs. - Adjust product mix, gradually reducing low-margin, commoditized products while increasing capacity for functional fabrics and specialty yarns. - Strengthen R&D investment, co-develop customized products with downstream brand clients to enhance customer stickiness and pricing power through technical ties.

资料来源:中华纺织网查看原始资料
⚙
Manage your textile business with Jenny ERP
Sample · Order · Customer · Inventory · Production tracking — built for fabric mills and trading companies.
Try Free