8800 RMB per ton. That was the mainstream market quotation for polyester FDY (150D/96F, semi-dull AA grade) on July 27, 2026. Both Rongsheng Petrochemical and Zhejiang Juxing Chemical quoted the same level, signaling a temporary market equilibrium that masks an intensifying tug-of-war between upstream and downstream players.
Supply-Demand Dynamics Behind the Price Stall
On the raw material side, PTA and MEG prices have shown high-level volatility recently. PTA is supported by tight PX supply, but downstream polyester operating rates have not risen in tandem, weakening cost pass-through. MEG inventories at ports remain low, but expectations of new capacity additions cap price upside. Combined, cost support for polyester FDY is weaker than in Q2.
From the supply side, the polyester industry's overall operating rate hovers around 85%, with ample FDY supply. Large integrated players like Rongsheng still have cost advantages, but small and medium polyester mills are seeing margins squeezed to near breakeven. This means any significant swing in raw material prices could quickly trigger FDY price adjustments.
Demand remains cautious. Downstream weaving mills, facing weaker-than-expected recovery in garment orders, are adopting a 'buy-as-needed' strategy. Major weaving clusters like Shengze and Changxing operate at around 70% capacity, with grey fabric inventories destocking slowly. Buyers are reluctant to build inventory at current price levels.
Industry Impact: Margin Squeeze and Capacity Adjustment
At 8800 RMB/ton, integrated producers still see thin profits, but independent FDY mills relying on purchased raw materials are near breakeven. Industry surveys show some small polyester producers are considering cutting runs or switching to differentiated products, especially in traditional FDY production bases like Shaoxing and Xiaoshan.
Downstream, the price stall pressures texturing and weaving segments. Texturing mills buying FDY to produce DTY also face squeezed margins. The fabric market lacks hot varieties, with competition intensifying on conventional items like polyester taffeta and pongee, further transmitting downward price expectations.
Notably, the price spread between FDY and POY has narrowed to below normal levels, typically a signal of weak industry sentiment. Historical patterns suggest that when the spread stays below 500 RMB/ton, polyester mills may initiate production cuts to support prices.
Q3 Outlook: Waiting for Order Breakthrough
As August approaches, the traditional 'Golden September and Silver October' peak season is the biggest variable. Export data for H1 2026 shows slowing growth in textile and apparel exports, with US and European replenishment demand weaker than expected. Domestic demand is characterized by 'volume up, price down', with e-commerce channels intensifying low-price competition.
Raw material uncertainty remains. PTA futures positions are high, with clear divergence between bulls and bears. Any disruption in PX prices due to geopolitical events or maintenance could quickly transmit to FDY quotes. MEG new capacity startup schedules are a key focus.
For market participants, the most critical factor now is the substantive recovery of end-user orders. Pure cost-push price increases are unsustainable; only true demand recovery can break the 8800 RMB deadlock.
