Cotton futures rebounded modestly on July 27 after Friday's notable pullback. The ICE December contract settled at 80.88 cents per pound, up 0.9 cents or 1.1%. The move was driven by two factors: technical buying following the previous session's decline, and a retreat in the US dollar index from recent highs, which lowered purchasing costs for overseas buyers.
Background
Over the first four trading days of last week, cotton futures rallied on the back of higher crude oil, strength in the grain complex, and improving signals from Chinese demand. However, weak export sales data and a stronger dollar on Friday triggered a decline of more than 1.5%. This pattern of gains followed by a reversal reflects a market lacking a clear directional catalyst, with prices swaying between macro sentiment and short-term speculative flows.
The USDA's latest Crop Progress report showed the US cotton good-to-excellent rate at 46% for the week ending July 26, up slightly from 45% the previous week but still well below last year's 55%. Squaring reached 81% and setting bolls 45%, both in line with the five-year average. This suggests that while quality ratings are below par, crop development is on track, leaving the critical yield window open for August.
Industry Impact
Supply expectations from Brazil have tightened marginally. StoneX forecasts Brazil's 2026/27 cotton output at 3.83 million tons, down 1.5% year-on-year. Although planted area is expected to expand, the El Niño weather pattern could weigh on yields. For the global cotton-textile chain, a lower Brazilian crop—Brazil being the second-largest exporter—implies a firmer floor under international prices, particularly for mid-to-low grade cotton.
The dollar remains a key short-term variable. A softer greenback on July 27 made dollar-denominated cotton more attractive to non-US buyers. However, a sharp 7% drop in crude oil the same day—following news that the US had suspended airstrikes on Iran, easing geopolitical tensions—could lower the cost of synthetic alternatives, potentially undermining cotton's price competitiveness.
