On August 4, polyester DTY (150D/48F, melt-spun, AA grade, semi-dull, low-elastic) quotes showed a narrow divergence across major production areas in Zhejiang: most enterprises in Hangzhou quoted 9450-9650 yuan per ton, while a Shaoxing mill reported 9300 yuan, a gap of about 150 yuan. This spread, though small, reflects the delicate supply-demand tug-of-war in the polyester filament market—leading producers are keen to hold prices, while some smaller mills have started to offer concessions.
Background
The seven companies involved in this quote update are all active suppliers in Zhejiang's polyester chain, including Rongsheng Petrochemical, Tongkun Group, Zhengkai Chemical Fiber, Jisi New Material, Kaisi Group, Senkai New Material, and Juxing Chemical Fiber. Rongsheng and Jisi both quoted 9450 yuan, while Tongkun led at 9650 yuan. In contrast, Juxing in Shaoxing offered the lowest at 9300 yuan.
Notably, the price gap correlates with geography: quotes from Hangzhou and surrounding areas are relatively concentrated, while Shaoxing shows a clear low point. This may relate to differences in inventory pressure, sales strategies, and customer structures. As a key distribution hub for textile raw materials, Zhejiang's price movements often signal broader market trends, making this narrow fluctuation worth monitoring.
Industry Impact
From an industry perspective, 150D/48F DTY is a common raw material for woven fabrics and warp knitting. Its price directly affects the procurement costs of midstream weaving mills. Current quotes have eased from earlier highs but remain relatively elevated, meaning fabric manufacturers must be more cautious when calculating raw material costs for new orders. For traders, the 150-yuan spread offers arbitrage opportunities, but they should be wary of quality and supply stability from lower-priced sources.
On a deeper level, this narrow divergence reflects a stalemate in the polyester filament chain: upstream PTA and MEG prices are volatile, offering limited cost support, while downstream weaving mills are operating at moderate rates and resist high-priced materials. Leading companies like Tongkun and Rongsheng maintain quotes due to scale advantages, while smaller mills cut prices to ease cash flow pressure. This divergence may intensify market wait-and-see sentiment.
