On August 7, quotes from major cotton yarn producing areas in Shandong revealed a key signal: for the same 21S high-grade ring-spun knitting yarn, prices ranged from 22,700 to 24,200 RMB/ton, a spread of 1,500 RMB/ton; for 32S, the spread widened to 2,100 RMB/ton. This significant divergence within the same specification and region is not merely a brand premium, but a microcosm of the current supply-demand imbalance in the cotton yarn market.
Background
According to the quote details, in Weifang, Guanjie, Jinyi, and Runfengda quoted 21S at 24,200, 23,000, and 23,000 RMB/ton respectively, while Guanxing Textile (Guanxian) quoted 22,700. For 32S, Shandong Hongyang Chemical quoted 26,400, notably higher than others; Guanjie 25,200; Jinyi and Runfengda both 24,600; Guanxing 24,300. Notably, all quotes specify high-grade, first-quality, ring-spun, natural white, for knitting. With identical specifications, the price gaps can only stem from differences in cost structures, inventory strategies, or market outlooks.
Behind this divergence lies the transmission of raw material costs. Recent fluctuations in Zhengzhou cotton futures, coupled with different purchasing timings and inventory cycles, have led to significant production cost discrepancies. Additionally, as a major cotton yarn producing region, Shandong's mills vary in scale and customer base: large enterprises rely on long-term orders and keep prices firm; smaller ones adjust flexibly to maintain cash flow. Moreover, uneven recovery in downstream knitting and weaving orders has split views on price acceptance.
Industry Impact
The widening spread offers both opportunities and risks for buyers. On one hand, a 22,700 RMB/ton quote represents a ~6% cost reduction, attractive to small garment factories with thin margins; on the other, low prices may signal supply instability or quality inconsistency, especially during raw material volatility, as mills might adjust cotton blending to cut costs. Thus, buyers should not focus solely on price but evaluate raw material reserves, production lead times, and quality control.
For mills, price divergence intensifies competition. High-priced mills risk losing customers unless they offer added value in quality or service; low-priced mills face squeezed profits, potentially hindering equipment upgrades and R&D. Notably, the 32S spread is larger than 21S, indicating fiercer competition in higher-count yarns, possibly due to slower demand growth—a caution for capacity expansion.
From an export perspective, cotton yarn price fluctuations directly affect cost calculations for export orders. With increased RMB exchange rate volatility, a widening gap between domestic purchase prices and overseas quotes could weaken export competitiveness. Simultaneously, delivery risk rises—when raw material prices are unstable, suppliers may delay shipments to await better prices; exporters should include clear penalty clauses in contracts.
