On August 7, 2026, public quotes for PET FDY 150D/96F semi-dull yarn ranged from 8,410 to 8,760 yuan per ton among major Zhejiang producers, a spread of 350 yuan. Such a wide gap for identical specifications is unusual in recent months and signals more than just brand premiums or logistics differences. For downstream weavers and traders, this divergence presents both opportunities and red flags.

Pricing Landscape: Leaders vs. Regional Players

Tongkun Group led with 8,760 yuan/ton, while Rongsheng Petrochemical and Tiansheng Chemical quoted 8,500 and 8,660 yuan respectively. In Shaoxing, Jiabao Fiber and Juxing Chemical offered 8,410 and 8,500 yuan. Kaishi Group sat in the middle at 8,650 yuan. The pattern is clear: Hangzhou-based integrated giants priced higher, while Shaoxing regional mills quoted lower.

This stratification is not accidental. Tongkun and Rongsheng, with integrated refining and chemical operations, enjoy high raw material self-sufficiency, yet they price higher—suggesting a strategy to protect brand premium and product positioning. Conversely, Shaoxing firms like Jiabao and Juxing, which depend on purchased PTA and MEG, face higher cost volatility. Their lower quotes likely aim to destock quickly and secure cash flow.

Industry Implications of the Widening Gap

A 350-yuan spread means a mid-to-large weaving factory purchasing hundreds of tons per batch could see cost differences ranging from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of yuan. With weak end demand and thin margins on greige fabrics, this gap directly determines order profitability. Thus, the quote divergence provides a clear benchmark for buyers to negotiate.

At a deeper level, the widening gap reflects divergent market outlooks: leading enterprises holding firm prices may anticipate raw material stabilization or recovery, while lower-priced firms are more concerned about inventory pressure and prefer to trade volume for price. If this divergence persists, it could intensify market wait-and-see sentiment, dampening overall transaction activity in the short term.

Transmission to Procurement and Foreign Trade

For domestic weaving enterprises, the quote gap allows more precise supplier selection, but they must watch for hidden quality downgrades in color fastness or strength on cheaper lots. For foreign trade orders, if export quotes are based on higher-priced raw materials while actual procurement uses lower-priced sources, profit margins can improve temporarily. However, if clients benchmark against the lower quotes, it may compress pricing space.

Additionally, the spread may trigger cross-regional material flows, as lower-priced Shaoxing goods penetrate higher-priced markets like Hangzhou and Jiaxing, intensifying local competition. Weaving clusters such as Shengze and Changxing may need to reassess supplier rosters in the next procurement cycle.

Practical Recommendations

For Procurement Teams - Establish a multi-supplier comparison mechanism, but require quality test reports for each batch, focusing on breaking strength and elongation. - Use the price gap as leverage to negotiate long-term agreements with high-priced suppliers, locking in supply for the next 3-6 months. - Monitor PTA and MEG futures trends; if costs decline, consider delaying large orders to await further price adjustments.

For Foreign Trade Companies - Adopt a range-based pricing strategy in external quotes to accommodate raw material fluctuations, avoiding being arbitraged by clients due to a single high or low price. - Prioritize cooperation with leading enterprises for stable quality, which is crucial for export credibility, especially for high-end fabric orders to Europe and the US. - Track regional quote dynamics across Zhejiang and adjust sourcing accordingly, but evaluate logistics costs and delivery risks.

资料来源:中国纺织报查看原始资料
⚙
Manage your textile business with Jenny ERP
Sample · Order · Customer · Inventory · Production tracking — built for fabric mills and trading companies.
Try Free