While most cotton yarn varieties are being discounted during the off-season, 60S and higher-count combed yarns remain firmly priced. This divergence is not accidental—it signals a shift from scale-based competition to value-based competition in the cotton textile industry. For buyers and mills, understanding this signal is more practically significant than predicting Zhengzhou cotton futures.
Market Divergence: Premium Holds, Low-End Under Pressure
Since late July, inland mills have offered discounts to clear inventory, but high-count yarn prices have remained stable. This pattern of "discounts for low-end, firmness for high-end" directly reflects structural changes in downstream demand—oversupply in conventional varieties versus sustained support for differentiated high-count yarn orders. For buyers, this means stronger bargaining power in low-count yarns, but they should be wary of quality compromise; for mills, it is crucial to assess whether their product mix aligns with this trend.
Chain Transmission: Squeeze from Costs and Inventory
Upstream, cotton feedstock prices fluctuate, low-priced inland yarn impacts the market, and large Xinjiang mills face slower sales and rising payment collection risks. Despite maintaining high operating rates of 90%, rotor-spun and low-to-mid count ring-spun categories are struggling. This state of "high utilization, low profit" is unsustainable; once cash flow tightens, production cuts or discount sales could trigger a chain reaction. Downstream weaving mills, yarn distributors, and garment factories adopt low-inventory, on-demand purchasing strategies, further compressing buffer space in the middle of the chain.
Rising Dyeing Costs: The Last Straw for End-Users?
Since the start of 2026, dye prices have surged by over 65%, with dyeing auxiliaries and labor costs rising in tandem. Many dyeing plants in Jiangsu and Zhejiang have raised processing fees; large dyeing mills in Shaoxing increased knit fabric fees by 0.5 yuan per kilogram and woven fabric by 0.2 yuan per meter. Seemingly modest, these increases are difficult for weaving and garment companies to absorb amid weak consumption and low-price competition, hindering cost transmission downstream. This means rising dyeing costs may accelerate supplier selection, favoring dye houses with strong cost control, while less competitive processors face elimination.
Implications for Enterprises: Off-Season Preparation, Peak-Season Harvest
The industry is waiting for "Golden September and Silver October" orders to materialize, but passive waiting is inferior to proactive adjustment. The price divergence in cotton yarn has already indicated the direction: high-count and differentiated products are more resilient, while conventional varieties are trapped in price wars. Enterprises should use the off-season to optimize product structures, secure quality customers, and hedge raw material price fluctuations through futures or long-term contracts. For foreign trade companies, it is essential to monitor exchange rates and overseas demand changes to avoid overlooking structural opportunities in export markets due to domestic competition.
