The widening gap between raw material costs and finished product prices is eroding profits across cotton textile enterprises. At the 2026 Annual Meeting of the Cotton Textile Raw Material Supply Chain Branch, held in Qingdao on August 13, attendees pinpointed a core issue: the failure of price transmission. This means upstream cotton price hikes cannot be smoothly passed downstream, forcing companies to absorb cost pressures, making profit recovery elusive.

Event Background

The closed-door meeting brought together key figures including association president Dong Kuiyong, branch leader Wei Gangmin, and representatives from the National Cotton Trading Market, with a direct focus on securing supply chains and improving quality. Reports indicate that over 2025-2026, the branch has repeatedly submitted policy proposals to authorities, covering sensitive areas such as cotton system reform, import quotas, target prices, and reserve cotton rotation, while conducting field research in production areas. These actions show the industry is seeking a more favorable raw material environment through institutional channels.

Currently, the cotton textile sector faces a triple squeeze: global commodity volatility raises procurement costs, shifting domestic and international demand structures shrink orders, and seasonal off-peak effects intensify competition. The branch's work report mentioned "customized services" and "resource matching," essentially building practical support systems to ease cotton supply pressures. Notably, the meeting did not stop at problem identification but proposed specific policy directions, offering industry-side input for macro-control optimization.

Industry Impact

In his summary, Dong Kuiyong sent a key signal: the industry must abandon sole reliance on cotton. He explicitly required the branch to strengthen research and supply chain support for polyester staple fiber, viscose staple fiber, Lyocell, and novel bio-based fibers. This indicates a substantial shift in raw material structures for cotton textile enterprises, with a significant increase in non-cotton fiber usage expected. For procurement teams, this means material choices are no longer limited to cotton, expanding price negotiation space and risk hedging options.

Another core insight is the necessity of financial tools. Given broken price transmission, refined management alone is insufficient; companies must learn to use futures, options, and other professional financial instruments to hedge against price volatility. This is not just for large firms; small and medium factories should gradually build such risk management capabilities. Meanwhile, the meeting's "whole-chain symbiosis" concept emphasizes integrating procurement, R&D, marketing, and branding, potentially ending the previous fragmentation and enabling precise matching of raw materials with end-user demand.

Practical Recommendations

For Procurement Teams - Build a diversified fiber procurement portfolio, incorporating polyester, viscose, and Lyocell into routine price comparisons to reduce cotton dependency. - Monitor reserve cotton rotation and import quota policy developments to lock in low-cost raw materials during policy windows. - Learn and pilot hedging tools such as futures to mitigate price fluctuations rather than passively absorbing them.

For Foreign Trade Companies - Adjust product mixes to increase the share of blended or differentiated fiber products, avoiding the red ocean of pure cotton goods. - Strengthen resource connections with upstream branches and industrial clusters, leveraging association platforms for tailored supply information and policy support. - Track end-market demand shifts closely, using supply chain agility to match overseas orders requiring short lead times.

资料来源:全球纺织网查看原始资料
⚙
Manage your textile business with Jenny ERP
Sample · Order · Customer · Inventory · Production tracking — built for fabric mills and trading companies.
Try Free