At the same time, the polyester staple fiber market presents a notable price divergence: Henan Kaijie's fiber balls (ordinary) are quoted steadily at 15500 RMB/ton, while cotton-type polyester staple fiber (1.56dtex*38mm, melt direct spinning) in Jiangsu and Zhejiang is priced between 7560 and 7920 RMB/ton. The nearly double gap reflects deeper structural differences in capacity, downstream demand, and pricing logic across domestic polyester industrial belts.
Background
According to public quote data on August 28, Henan Kaijie Water Treatment Co., Ltd. reported fiber ball products at 15500 RMB/ton regardless of diameter (50mm, 40mm, or 30mm), indicating strong price rigidity. Hebei Chujiao Supply Chain Co., Ltd. quoted three brands of cotton-type staple—Zhonglei, Huahong, and Huaxicun—at 7870, 7560, and 7920 RMB/ton respectively, with a gap within 360 RMB/ton, a normal brand premium range.
Notably, these quotes come from traders, not mills. Trader quotes include logistics, warehousing, and capital costs, thus better reflecting actual regional circulation. Henan, as an industrial belt for water treatment filter media, produces fiber balls as high-value-added industrial textiles, whose prices remain independent of bulk cotton-type staple. Meanwhile, Jiangsu Wuxi and Zhejiang Huzhou are major clusters for melt direct spinning staple, with prices closer to commodity fundamentals.
Industrial Impact
The regional divergence is not short-term fluctuation but a necessary result of industrial structure differences. Cotton-type staple, used in yarn and nonwovens, is influenced by upstream costs (crude oil, PTA) and inventory cycles. Current quotes of 7560-7920 RMB/ton suggest the industry is near breakeven, squeezing small and medium capacities.
In contrast, fiber balls serve water treatment and environmental projects, with rigid demand and smaller batch sizes, leading to lower price sensitivity and supporting the high level of 15500 RMB/ton. This divergence signals that polyester staple is not a single market but segmented by application, each with distinct pricing power and risk profiles.
For downstream buyers, regional gaps allow price comparison across origins, but logistics costs and delivery times must be included. For traders, cross-regional arbitrage exists but is constrained by brand certification and quality consistency.
