On August 27, ICE cotton futures for December settled at 92.41 cents per pound, up 3.67% on the day and touching an intraday high of 92.75 cents, the highest since April 2024. This marks the first time futures have broken above the 90-cent threshold since early 2024, with a monthly gain of over 13%. For the textile industry chain, this signals rapidly accumulating pressure on raw material costs, squeezing profit margins for yarn, fabric, and apparel segments.
Event Background
The direct driver is the deteriorating condition of US cotton crops. The latest USDA crop progress report shows the good-to-excellent rate at only 37%, compared with 54% a year ago. This significant drop is viewed as a substantive supply reduction signal rather than mere sentiment. Field tours reported notable crop deterioration, and expectations of a strong El Niño this year have heightened concerns about rainfall patterns in key growing regions.
Notably, this rally is not isolated. Strength in the grain market provided additional support, and a 2.1% rebound in crude oil after a three-day decline also indirectly underpinned cotton prices. But the primary driver remains supply contraction expectations. For Chinese textile mills, US cotton is a major import source, and its price movement directly affects import cost calculations, making this breakout practically significant.
Industry Impact
The transmission of high cotton prices through the supply chain is not linear. First, spinning mills, especially those using US cotton for mid-to-high-end yarns, face immediate cost increases. Second, fabric and apparel manufacturers face a dilemma: raising prices may lose orders, while absorbing costs erodes margins. Historically, when cotton breaks above 90 cents, it tends to consolidate at high levels for a while, giving downstream players a window to adjust, but the window may be short.
Export demand is more concerning. The USDA export sales report for the week ending August 20 showed net sales of 95,726 bales, down 54% from the previous week, with China purchasing only 1,628 bales, and zero for the next marketing year. This suggests that high prices are not being met by demand, especially from Chinese buyers, indicating a lack of fundamental support and potential for a pullback, or perhaps Chinese buyers are waiting for better pricing opportunities.
For domestic textile hubs like Keqiao and Shengze, fabric enterprises need to monitor the linkage between cotton and chemical fiber prices. A rise in cotton often lifts substitutes like polyester staple fiber, affecting the entire raw material cost system. Buyers with low-priced inventories can afford to be more flexible, while those with insufficient stocks should be wary of delayed cost impacts on order quotations.
