During the 34th week of 2026 (August 24-28), textile bulk commodity prices presented a striking contrast: polyester POY, DTY, and FDY rose by 2.00%, 1.76%, and 1.70%, respectively, while acrylonitrile and PTA dropped by 4.46% and 3.67%. These seemingly contradictory movements reflect distinct supply-demand dynamics across different segments of the industrial chain.

Market Overview

The overall average change in the textile sector was merely 0.03%, masking significant underlying volatility. Among the tracked commodities, ten rose while only three fell, but the declines were deeper than the gains. Polyester filament led the upside, with prices reaching 8,767.5 RMB/ton (POY), 9,930.71 RMB/ton (DTY), and 8,970 RMB/ton (FDY), all up over 21% year-on-year. In contrast, acrylonitrile plunged 4.46% to 11,433.33 RMB/ton, despite still being 44.12% higher than last year. PTA also fell 3.67% to 6,213.25 RMB/ton, with year-on-year growth narrowing to 26.54%.

Nylon products (DTY, POY, FDY) also advanced, but by smaller margins of 0.29%-0.97%. Cotton-related items such as cotton yarn and polyester yarn were largely flat, while silk, viscose staple fiber, and modal rose modestly. This divergence suggests capital and demand are concentrating in the chemical fiber segment.

Industrial Impact

The strength of polyester filament is directly supported by downstream weaving mills' restocking demand. Late August is the peak season for autumn/winter fabric orders, with loom operating rates in Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces remaining high, creating rigid demand for POY and DTY. Additionally, firm upstream PX prices facilitated cost pass-through, allowing polyester producers to raise prices smoothly. However, with polyester prices already 20% above last year, if final apparel consumption disappoints, high raw material costs could squeeze weaving profits and dampen future orders.

Acrylonitrile's slump tells a different story. As a feedstock for acrylic fiber and ABS resin, acrylonitrile faces pressure from newly commissioned capacity, while downstream acrylic fiber mills operate at low rates due to weak final demand and only purchase on a need basis. This oversupply has driven prices down. PTA's decline also stems from ample supply, but is more tied to oil price fluctuations and high inventory levels. For chemical fiber enterprises, the divergence in raw material costs complicates cost management, with the 'strong polyester, weak acrylonitrile' trend likely to persist into Q4.

From a profit distribution perspective, profits are shifting from upstream raw materials (acrylonitrile, PTA) to downstream fiber segments (polyester, nylon). This highlights that in a cycle of capacity mismatch, players with pricing power will capture excess returns. Textile companies should closely monitor inventory days and operating rates to anticipate price turning points.

Practical Recommendations

For Buyers - For polyester filament, consider phased purchasing to avoid chasing highs, as short-term gains may invite correction. - Delay procurement of acrylonitrile and downstream acrylic products, awaiting signs of price stabilization; medium-term downside remains. - Monitor the correlation between PTA and oil; if oil rebounds, PTA may see technical recovery, so lock in costs early.

For Mills - Optimize raw material inventory: increase polyester feedstock stocks and reduce acrylonitrile-related holdings to align with price trends. - Negotiate floating price clauses with downstream customers to partially transfer raw material risk and protect processing margins. - Strengthen coordination between production planning and procurement, using futures to hedge against PTA price volatility.

资料来源:中华纺织网查看原始资料
⚙
Manage your textile business with Jenny ERP
Sample · Order · Customer · Inventory · Production tracking — built for fabric mills and trading companies.
Try Free