In August 2026, the textile raw material market saw a rare broad-based rally: of the 17 monitored bulk commodities, 16 rose month-on-month, with an average gain of 2.52%. PTA led with a 6.02% increase, followed by cotton at 5.63%, while most polyester and nylon varieties gained over 3%. This is not an isolated event—year-on-year data shows many products are now 20% higher than last year, with acrylonitrile up 44.12%. Behind these price signals lie multiple dynamics: cost pass-through, supply-demand rebalancing, and profit redistribution across the supply chain.

Background

The monthly price changes show clear tiering. The first tier comprises PTA and cotton, both up over 5%, directly raising cost benchmarks for the chemical fiber and cotton spinning sectors. The second tier includes polyester DTY, nylon POY, and polyester staple fiber, with gains between 3% and 4.5%, indicating cost-push transmission downstream. The third tier covers yarns like viscose, polyester yarn, and cotton yarn, with gains of 1-2%, lagging but still positive. Notably, spandex was the only decliner, falling just 0.56%, likely due to ample supply.

From an industrial cluster perspective, PTA price hikes directly impact the polyester hub in Jiangsu and Zhejiang, while cotton increases affect cotton spinning centers in Shandong and Henan. Yarn mills face a dilemma: raise prices and risk losing orders, or absorb costs and see margins erode. In August, cotton yarn 32S rose only 0.81% versus cotton's 5.63%, showing weaker pricing power downstream and an imbalanced profit distribution.

Industry Impact

The primary driver is cost, not demand. PTA's 28.87% year-on-year surge stems from higher oil prices and tight PX supply; cotton's 20.17% rise reflects reduced acreage and weather disruptions. However, downstream orders for apparel and home textiles haven't surged in tandem, meaning costs can't be fully passed through, squeezing margins across the chain.

For buyers, raw material inflation directly raises production costs for autumn/winter fabrics. Polyester DTY up 21.66% year-on-year puts pressure on polyester-based fabrics like faux silk and sportswear. Cotton yarn 32S is up only 5.63%, relatively moderate, but if cotton stays high, catch-up increases are likely. Buyers should monitor price linkage and avoid concentrated restocking at peaks.

Another signal is spandex's counter-trend decline. Amid broad gains, its slight drop reflects ample capacity and intense competition. For elastic fabric producers, this offers a cost-offset opportunity—in an overall rising cost cycle, relatively cheap spandex helps alleviate some pressure.

For foreign trade, if the RMB remains stable, higher raw material costs will weaken the price competitiveness of Chinese textile exports, especially for low-value commodity orders, which may shift to Southeast Asian competitors. However, high-end differentiated products are less affected, as clients prioritize quality and delivery over price.

Practical Recommendations

For Buyers - Track PTA and cotton futures; if they pull back, delay purchases; if they keep rising, book in batches to lock in costs. - For polyester and nylon fabrics, prioritize quarterly contracts with suppliers to avoid monthly volatility. - Leverage low spandex prices to increase spandex content in elastic fabrics, balancing overall costs.

For Foreign Trade Companies - Include raw material price linkage clauses in quotes to protect margins from cost swings. - Focus on high-value, differentiated orders to reduce reliance on low-end commodity products and enhance price pass-through. - Monitor Southeast Asian competitors; if raw material price gaps widen, strengthen delivery speed and quality to retain customer loyalty.

资料来源:中华纺织网查看原始资料
⚙
Manage your textile business with Jenny ERP
Sample · Order · Customer · Inventory · Production tracking — built for fabric mills and trading companies.
Try Free